The RECAP criteria are helpful when you evaluate your sources:
How relevant is this source to what you are trying to accomplish? Is it too broad or too narrow in scope?
Would you be better served by another source?
Tip: Read the abstract in order to determine relevance.
Can you verify the information presented? Is each assertion supported by evidence or common knowledge?
Does the author explain their methodology? Have their claims been checked by an editor or reviewer?
Can you check the author’s sources?
How up to date is the information? If it isn't current/recent scholarship, are you choosing older sources deliberately?
Can you identify the author?
What is their area of expertise? What are their credentials?
Do they have an obvious bias or agenda?
Why did the author write this publication?
Did they want to inform, persuade, or entertain?
What audience did they have in mind?
Recognize appropriate information resources per discipline through understanding the role of authoritative voices in a subject area.
Determine attributes of authoritative information for different needs, with the understanding that context plays a role in authority-based attributes
Distinguish between different types of sources (i.e. scholarly, popular) in order to select appropriate sources for the research need.
Attribution: Private Academic Library Network of Indiana (PALNI). "Possible Learning Objectives." Oct 16, 2020. LibGuide Box. PALINI, Indianapolis, IN. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Frame: Authority Is Constructed and Contextual. Web October 19, 2020. https://libguides.palni.edu/ilframework/authority
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License. | Details of our policy